North Carolina's Intensive Intervention Implementation Story In 2018, North Carolina began its partnership with NCII. This video describes the reasoning behind the state’s involvement with NCII and how the partnership is so critical to the work across state initiatives. From the Department of Public Instruction (DPI), their state education agency, to their North Carolina State Improvement Project (NC SIP), state-wide coaches, and institutions of higher education, North Carolina is building a strong infrastructure for intensive intervention and DBI. In the short time since the start, these partners have built a strong system of dissemination throughout the state, utilizing tools developed by NCII to support DBI implementation across state initiatives.
Search
Resource Type
DBI Process
Subject
Implementation Guidance and Considerations
Student Population
Audience
Search
The National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) has been working intensively with Michigan's MTSS (MiMTSS) Technical Assistance Center since 2017 to create coherence and support local-level implementation of intensive intervention in Michigan.
Starting in 2016, NCII has worked with Colorado, Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming to support DBI implementation. To learn more about the work in these states, click on the states in the map and review the recommendations for building state capacity to support DBI implementation.
The Academic Intervention Taxonomy Briefs provide educators with information they can use to evaluate the appropriateness of academic interventions available on the academic intervention tools chart for a specific student or group of students who require intervention. The information included in the briefs is organized along the seven dimensions of the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity
In this Voices from the Field post, we archive the presentations from day 3 of the NCII 10-year celebration of the implementation of intensive intervention. On this day, panelists shared stories focused on improving outcomes for students through DBI implementation.
In this Voices from the Field post, we archive the presentations from day 2 of the NCII 10-year celebration of the implementation of intensive intervention. On this day, panelists shared stories focused on preparing in-service and pre-service educators and leaders to implement intensive intervention.
In this Voices from the Field post, we archive the presentations from day 1 of the NCII 10-year celebration of the implementation of intensive intervention. On this day, panelists shared stories focused on creating the systems to support implementation of intensive intervention.
This checklist can be used by teams to help identify ideas to intensify interventions based on their hypothesis for why the student may not be responding to an intervention. The checklist is aligned with the dimensions of the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity.
This question bank includes questions that teams can use to develop a hypothesis about why an individual or group of students may not be responding to an intervention. The hypothesis should help guide intervention planning and selection of intensification strategies using the Intervention Intensification Strategy Checklist. When developing a hypothesis, teams should consider the intervention design, fidelity of implementation, and learner needs. Intervention fidelity data collected using the Student Intervention Implementation Log and informal diagnostic data may help teams answer the questions included in the question bank.
In this video, you will hear about the history of the National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) and its approach to intensive intervention, data-based individualization (DBI). The video shares where this worked started and how it has grown and evolved over the last 10 years